IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sullivan Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-02-20 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 40 1 4 5 0.125 0.0482 0.0520 0.1819 0.1964
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26781
Defenseman overall
#1376
Defenseman born in 2008
#3305
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Lucas Jones
AJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Mario Gasparini
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Jack Malinski
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Cory Thomas
SJHL 2015-16
0.07
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Conner Enciso
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Foster
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Carter
Finlandia · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.