← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Thomas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 36 2 3 5 0.139 0.0356 0.0384 0.1047 0.1129
2016-17 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 49 2 8 10 0.204 0.0523 0.0538 0.1539 0.1583
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Canisius D1 AHA 34 2 1 3 0.088
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 27 1 0 1 0.037
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 30 0 3 3 0.100
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 1 1 2 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2017-18 · Vermont
+48.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25373
Defenseman overall
#3191
Defenseman born in 1998
#2141
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2020-21
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.