← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Russo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-19 Country: USA
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 30 0 18 18 0.600 0.1207 0.1207 0.2744 0.2744
2023-24 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 0 18 18 0.562 0.1131 0.1131 0.2572 0.2572
2024-25 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 31 1 7 8 0.258 0.0519 0.0519 0.1180 0.1180
2025-26 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 49 0 3 3 0.061 0.0236 0.0244 0.0890 0.0920
2026-27 Tri-City Storm USHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.2360 0.2360 1.2003 1.2003
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22423
Defenseman overall
#2703
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2014-15
0.31
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
BCHL 2018-19
0.54
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
BCHL 2018-19
0.50
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
NAHL 2016-17
0.17
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.