← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Russo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-19 Country: USA
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 30 0 18 18 0.600 0.1189 0.1189 0.2734 0.2734
2023-24 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 0 18 18 0.562 0.1114 0.1114 0.2563 0.2563
2024-25 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 31 1 7 8 0.258 0.0511 0.0511 0.1176 0.1176
2025-26 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 49 0 3 3 0.061 0.0236 0.0244 0.0891 0.0921
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22146
Defenseman overall
#2645
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.03
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
NAHL 2022-23
0.13
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
BCHL 2017-18
0.50
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
CCHL 2013-14
0.31
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2023-24
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2018-19
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.