IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Trench Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-13 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Breck USHS-MN 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.0734 0.0734 0.0662 0.0662
2023-24 Breck USHS-MN 26 18 28 46 1.769 0.4763 0.4763 0.4297 0.4297
2024-25 Breck USHS-MN 25 24 27 51 2.040 0.5492 0.5492 0.4955 0.4955
2025-26 Breck USHS-MN 26 32 46 78 3.000 0.8076 0.8076 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#914
Forward overall
#22
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Diamantoni
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Wood
Endicott · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2003-04
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will LeNeave
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.