← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Renkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-13 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 27 1 1 2 0.074 0.0437 0.0465 0.2226 0.2369
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 46 13 13 26 0.565 0.2077 0.2202 0.5966 0.6325
2024-25 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 30 6 5 11 0.367 0.2163 0.2084 1.1013 1.0612
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 43 20 63 1.050 0.6194 0.5670 3.1536 2.8866
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7417
Forward overall
#262
Forward born in 2005
#546
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont
BCHL 2012-13
0.97
actual FR PPG at Vermont
USHL 2023-24
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
BCHL 2012-13
0.32
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.