IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Steen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-03-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Calgary Royals AJHL 59 11 19 30 0.508 0.1706 0.1649 0.4713 0.4555
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Lake Forest D3 — SR 14 4 6 10 0.714
2004-05 Lake Forest D3 — JR 24 8 14 22 0.917
2003-04 Lake Forest D3 — SO 28 8 15 23 0.821
2002-03 Lake Forest D3 — FR 26 6 8 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2002-03 · Lake Forest
+281.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33347
Forward overall
#734
Forward born in 1981
#1106
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Murphy
Curry · 1995-96
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rocco Andreacchi
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Hogg
Concordia (WI) · 2013-14
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.