IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reese Laubach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-20 Country: USA
2022 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #217  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — USHL 50 11 13 24 0.480 0.2951 0.2885 1.4142 1.3828
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 37 12 16 28 0.757
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 35 15 15 30 0.857
2023-24 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 35 10 12 22 0.629
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2023-24 · Penn State
+154.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16164
Forward overall
#799
Forward born in 2003
#1612
in USHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Botten
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Lindauer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2003-04
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.