IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-05-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 43 4 5 9 0.209 0.0694 0.0706 0.1940 0.1974
2002-03 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 60 16 14 30 0.500 0.1659 0.1659 0.4634 0.4634
2003-04 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 58 6 20 26 0.448 0.1487 0.1366 0.4155 0.3816
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 Bowdoin D3 — SR 18 1 2 3 0.167
2003-04 Worcester State D3 — FR 17 0 0 0 0.000
2002-03 Bowdoin D3 — JR 17 0 4 4 0.235
2002-03 UMass Boston D3 — FR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2001-02 Bowdoin D3 — SO 13 1 3 4 0.308

NCAAe Rankings

#39274
Forward overall
#1069
Forward born in 1983
#1762
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Lamirande
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Butler
Plymouth State · 2003-04
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Luhmann
Endicott · 2017-18
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.