IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Hunt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-04-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Calgary Canucks AJHL 63 8 20 28 0.444 0.1475 0.1500 0.4119 0.4188
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 33 12 33 45 1.364
2004-05 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 38 5 12 17 0.447
2003-04 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 27 3 16 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2003-04 · Mercyhurst
+397.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10885
Defenseman overall
#1057
Defenseman born in 1984
#1613
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Brenk
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Ryan
SUNY Brockport · 2009-10
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.