← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-06-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 34 0 2 2 0.059 0.0195 0.0210 0.0545 0.0587
2005-06 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 38 1 3 4 0.105 0.0349 0.0359 0.0976 0.1004
2006-07 AJHL 50 1 8 9 0.180 0.0597 0.0587 0.1668 0.1639
2007-08 Estevan Bruins SJHL 36 2 15 17 0.472 0.1438 0.1354 0.3499 0.3293
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 18 0 2 2 0.111
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2009-10 Adrian D3 SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Adrian D3 FR 14 0 4 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2008-09 · Adrian
+188.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21820
Defenseman overall
#1735
Defenseman born in 1987
#2716
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.