IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 33 4 3 7 0.212 0.0711 0.0766 0.1963 0.2116
2006-07 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 53 3 5 8 0.151 0.0506 0.0522 0.1396 0.1440
2007-08 — AJHL 61 5 15 20 0.328 0.1100 0.1074 0.3034 0.2963
2008-09 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 60 10 10 20 0.333 0.1118 0.1045 0.3084 0.2883
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA SR 26 4 8 12 0.462
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA JR 26 11 12 23 0.885
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA SO 27 9 13 22 0.815
2009-10 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 8 13 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2009-10 · Marian
+760.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47745
Forward overall
#1591
Forward born in 1988
#1968
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Jung
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hoy
Adrian · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Lumsden
Fredonia · 2001-02
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.