← New Search ↗ Social Card

Talon Sigurdson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 17 16 8 24 1.412 0.1847 0.1847 0.4792 0.4792
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 60 38 21 59 0.983 0.3613 0.3533 1.0379 1.0148
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 57 11 11 22 0.386 0.2277 0.2015 1.1593 1.0260
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 38 8 10 18 0.474
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 39 10 8 18 0.462
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 25 1 1 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2023-24 · Clarkson
-64.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12857
Forward overall
#640
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2024-25
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.