IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Trumble Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Calgary Canucks AJHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0716 0.1851 0.1976
2007-08 Calgary Canucks AJHL 49 20 19 39 0.796 0.2669 0.2702 0.7365 0.7457
2008-09 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 13 22 35 0.583 0.1956 0.1899 0.5398 0.5241
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 23 3 1 4 0.174
2011-12 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 28 9 6 15 0.536
2010-11 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 24 4 5 9 0.375
2009-10 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 11 1 1 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2009-10 · Amherst
-4.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25195
Forward overall
#841
Forward born in 1989
#707
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Edward Griffin
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cassidy Bowes
Endicott · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.