← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashton Reinboldt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Calgary Canucks AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Beausejour Blades MJHL 44 6 18 24 0.545 0.1050 0.1092 0.3440 0.3577
2008-09 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 46 5 12 17 0.370 0.1240 0.1230 0.3420 0.3393
2009-10 AJHL 34 7 22 29 0.853 0.2861 0.2692 0.7893 0.7428
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA 23 4 3 7 0.304
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA 19 5 6 11 0.579
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 7 0 3 3 0.429
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2010-11 · St. Norbert
+38.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28296
Forward overall
#935
Forward born in 1989
#849
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.