← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Hensler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-10-14 Country: USA
2025 · Round 1, Pick #23  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 31 7 17 24 0.774 0.0980 0.0980 0.1881 0.1881
2022-23 NTDP-U18 60 5 23 28 0.467 0.3469 0.3635 1.7414 1.8249
2023-24 NTDP-U18 61 4 28 32 0.525 0.3899 0.3886 1.9575 1.9508
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 23 4 8 12 0.522
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 32 2 10 12 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2024-25 · Wisconsin
+4.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2168
Defenseman overall
#392
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.