IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Herzog Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — AJHL 50 9 1 10 0.200 0.0671 0.0692 0.1851 0.1908
2008-09 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 61 5 11 16 0.262 0.0880 0.0871 0.2427 0.2401
2009-10 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 51 8 6 14 0.275 0.0921 0.0864 0.2540 0.2383
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 26 9 14 23 0.885
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 27 5 7 12 0.444
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 21 2 3 5 0.238
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 19 3 3 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2010-11 · Castleton
+325.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50363
Forward overall
#1685
Forward born in 1989
#2157
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Lovisek
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Watt
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Smythe
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.