← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Wilkinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-07-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 St. Albert Steel AJHL 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0530 0.0599 0.1456 0.1646
2008-09 St. Albert Steel AJHL 32 1 17 18 0.562 0.1887 0.2054 0.5189 0.5649
2009-10 St. Albert Steel AJHL 56 3 20 23 0.411 0.1377 0.1429 0.3788 0.3930
2010-11 AJHL 57 4 27 31 0.544 0.1824 0.1797 0.5017 0.4942
2011-12 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 59 6 26 32 0.542 0.1819 0.1699 0.5003 0.4674
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 14 1 15 16 1.143
2014-15 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2013-14 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 24 1 12 13 0.542
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 24 1 3 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2012-13 · Fredonia
1.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8916
Defenseman overall
#1161
Defenseman born in 1991
#1091
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.