IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhett Holland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-09-25 Country: Canada
2012 · Round 4, Pick #102  ·  Phoenix Coyotes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 57 3 8 11 0.193 0.0647 0.0742 0.1786 0.2048
2010-11 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 31 2 9 11 0.355 0.1190 0.1302 0.3283 0.3592
2011-12 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 47 3 7 10 0.213 0.0714 0.0745 0.1969 0.2054
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 33 3 5 8 0.242
2015-16 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 37 0 3 3 0.081
2014-15 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 35 1 3 4 0.114
2013-14 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 31 0 4 4 0.129
2012-13 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#19769
Defenseman overall
#1903
Defenseman born in 1993
#2157
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Bowes
Endicott · 2012-13
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Oleksiuk
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.