IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Kapeller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-11-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Calgary Canucks AJHL 44 2 8 10 0.227 0.0762 0.0804 0.2103 0.2219
2010-11 Calgary Canucks AJHL 57 5 15 20 0.351 0.1177 0.1180 0.3247 0.3255
2011-12 Calgary Canucks AJHL 58 6 9 15 0.259 0.0867 0.0825 0.2393 0.2277
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 19 1 3 4 0.210
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 12 1 0 1 0.083
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#48459
Forward overall
#1759
Forward born in 1991
#2011
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Primo Self
Endicott · 2021-22
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Hennessey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
James Boisvert
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.