← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Dorowicz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0479 0.0546 0.1322 0.1506
2010-11 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 38 7 10 17 0.447 0.1501 0.1632 0.4140 0.4500
2011-12 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 59 14 29 43 0.729 0.2444 0.2533 0.6744 0.6989
2012-13 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 60 14 29 43 0.717 0.2404 0.2368 0.6632 0.6532
2013-14 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 59 40 35 75 1.271 0.4264 0.3979 1.1764 1.0977
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 41 8 11 19 0.463
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 37 5 11 16 0.432
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 35 5 11 16 0.457
2014-15 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 32 5 3 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Robert Morris
-12.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14238
Forward overall
#526
Forward born in 1993
#225
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.