← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Fisher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-28 Country: USA
2022 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #203  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 3 7 10 0.333 0.0940 0.0940 0.1525 0.1525
2021-22 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 25 14 8 22 0.880 0.2482 0.2482 0.4027 0.4027
2022-23 USHL 42 3 7 10 0.238 0.1464 0.1464 0.7015 0.7013
2023-24 BCHL 54 20 16 36 0.667 0.2483 0.2424 0.9714 0.9482
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 36 2 1 3 0.083
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 24 1 1 2 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2024-25 · Northeastern
-52.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25812
Forward overall
#1458
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.