← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake McLean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 BCHL 48 3 10 13 0.271 0.1009 0.1009 0.3946 0.3946
2020-21 Merritt Centennials BCHL 12 3 4 7 0.583 0.2173 0.2173 0.8499 0.8499
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 17 39 56 0.933 0.3698 0.3716 0.9799 0.9845
2022-23 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 20 3 6 9 0.450 0.2766 0.2522 1.3258 1.2091
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 33 5 8 13 0.394
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 33 2 5 7 0.212
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 38 6 4 10 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2023-24 · Bemidji State
+2.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16381
Forward overall
#876
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.