IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camden Shasby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.2449 0.2449 0.7037 0.7037
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 5 20 25 0.431 0.1583 0.1777 0.4549 0.5105
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 41 1 7 8 0.195 0.1151 0.1185 0.5860 0.6033
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 12 0 3 3 0.250 0.1475 0.1445 0.7509 0.7358
2024-25 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 20 2 11 13 0.650 0.2388 0.2323 0.6861 0.6675
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 29 2 3 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Alaska Anchorage
-7.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4793
Defenseman overall
#1213
Defenseman born in 2004
#1614
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ludvig Steenberg
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Dubicki
Tufts · 2021-22
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Haeg
Saint John's · 2010-11
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.