IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camden Shasby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.2641 0.2641 0.7000 0.7000
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 5 20 25 0.431 0.1708 0.1917 0.4525 0.5078
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 41 1 7 8 0.195 0.1199 0.1234 0.5748 0.5918
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 12 0 3 3 0.250 0.1537 0.1506 0.7366 0.7218
2024-25 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 20 2 11 13 0.650 0.2575 0.2505 0.6824 0.6639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 29 2 3 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Alaska Anchorage
-13.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4705
Defenseman overall
#1216
Defenseman born in 2004
#1637
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Haeg
St. John's · 2010-11
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Penner
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Mozak
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.