← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Sparkes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-20 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #180  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 OJHL 37 5 7 12 0.324 0.0974 0.1014 0.2220 0.2311
2022-23 USHL 53 1 7 8 0.151 0.0928 0.0903 0.4446 0.4328
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.1317 0.1217 0.6314 0.5834
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 37 0 2 2 0.054
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC 38 1 4 5 0.132
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2024-25 · Clarkson
+27.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14586
Defenseman overall
#2762
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2016-17
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.