← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 27 8 14 22 0.815 0.2193 0.2193 0.1979 0.1979
2020-21 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 20 15 25 40 2.000 0.5384 0.5384 0.4858 0.4858
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 13 20 33 0.569 0.2254 0.2361 0.5974 0.6259
2022-23 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 10 2 4 6 0.600 0.3688 0.3522 1.7677 1.6881
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 32 5 8 13 0.406 0.2497 0.2261 1.1967 1.0834
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC 30 7 5 12 0.400
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC 22 1 0 1 0.045
2020-21 Aurora D1 FR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2018-19 St. Olaf D1 SR 24 0 1 1 0.042

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16711
Forward overall
#835
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.