← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ren Morque Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 27 2 5 7 0.259 0.0328 0.0328 0.0630 0.0630
2020-21 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 18 4 6 10 0.556 0.0703 0.0703 0.1350 0.1350
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 10 2 4 6 0.600 0.2204 0.2357 0.6333 0.6773
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 22 2 3 5 0.227 0.1341 0.1310 0.6827 0.6668
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 13 2 2 4 0.308 0.1815 0.1683 0.9241 0.8567
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA SO 35 3 5 8 0.229
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA 39 0 7 7 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2024-25 · Air Force
+24.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10458
Defenseman overall
#2237
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Beloit · 2022-23
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.