IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Weston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 44 1 12 13 0.295 0.0980 0.0994 0.2739 0.2778
2014-15 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 27 3 2 5 0.185 0.0564 0.0551 0.1373 0.1342
2015-16 Portage Terriers MJHL 42 7 27 34 0.809 0.2201 0.2028 0.5101 0.4699
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Marian D1 — SR 16 0 3 3 0.188
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA SR 16 0 3 3 0.188
2018-19 Marian D1 — JR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA JR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA SO 25 2 10 12 0.480
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA FR 19 0 3 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2016-17 · Marian
+16.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11664
Defenseman overall
#1604
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Callen Daily
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Code
Aurora · 2021-22
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Hoogenboom
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.