IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Callen Daily Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 41 10 10 20 0.488 0.0657 0.0657 0.1660 0.1660
2020-21 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 41 18 17 35 0.854 0.1149 0.1149 0.2906 0.2906
2021-22 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 39 20 26 46 1.179 0.1588 0.1468 0.4015 0.3711
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32750
Forward overall
#1352
Forward born in 2001
#1118
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Dietsch
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Reitter
Canton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McNair
Adrian · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.