← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Code Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 6 2 3 5 0.833 0.1807 0.1930 0.6447 0.6885
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 19 18 37 0.627 0.1360 0.1360 0.4852 0.4852
2020-21 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 CCHL 38 13 20 33 0.868 0.1884 0.1726 0.6719 0.6154
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 32 8 13 21 0.656
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 30 5 11 16 0.533
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 28 6 13 19 0.679
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 26 3 11 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2022-23 · Aurora
+248.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22004
Forward overall
#1076
Forward born in 2001
#413
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.