← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Code Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 6 2 3 5 0.833 0.2378 0.2540 0.6451 0.6890
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 19 18 37 0.627 0.1790 0.1790 0.4854 0.4854
2020-21 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 CCHL 38 13 20 33 0.868 0.2478 0.2270 0.6722 0.6157
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 32 8 13 21 0.656
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 30 5 11 16 0.533
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 28 6 13 19 0.679
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 26 3 11 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2022-23 · Aurora
+164.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17833
Forward overall
#614
Forward born in 2001
#501
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.