← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Tschumi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3354 0.3754 0.9254 1.0358
2014-15 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 56 13 11 24 0.429 0.1438 0.1533 0.3966 0.4228
2015-16 AJHL 52 11 20 31 0.596 0.2000 0.2039 0.5517 0.5625
2016-17 AJHL 44 10 14 24 0.545 0.1830 0.1777 0.5048 0.4901
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 20 2 4 6 0.300
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 13 1 2 3 0.231
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 19 1 0 1 0.053
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2017-18 · Colgate
-34.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32091
Forward overall
#1513
Forward born in 1997
#1033
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Michael's College · 2018-19
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2006-07
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.