IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Josefchak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-08-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 52 1 8 9 0.173 0.0581 0.0628 0.1602 0.1731
2015-16 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 50 2 6 8 0.160 0.0537 0.0555 0.1481 0.1531
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 5 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 20 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 26 1 2 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2016-17 · Colorado College
+109.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25216
Defenseman overall
#3022
Defenseman born in 1997
#2634
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rhett Rampinelli
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack O'Hanisain
Adrian · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Landyn Greatorex
Salem State · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.