← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Laderoute Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 52 5 17 22 0.423 0.1419 0.1521 0.3915 0.4195
2015-16 AJHL 54 9 22 31 0.574 0.1926 0.1974 0.5313 0.5447
2016-17 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 60 26 31 57 0.950 0.3186 0.3111 0.8791 0.8584
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 52 32 37 69 1.327 0.4450 0.4094 1.2279 1.1298
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 37 2 5 7 0.189
2021-22 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 38 10 3 13 0.342
2020-21 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC JR 28 3 7 10 0.357
2019-20 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 31 8 8 16 0.516
2018-19 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 38 7 5 12 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · Minnesota Duluth
-0.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12630
Forward overall
#567
Forward born in 1997
#181
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.