IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Orubor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — AJHL 28 5 4 9 0.321 0.1066 0.1101 0.2979 0.3077
2015-16 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 50 14 21 35 0.700 0.2323 0.2292 0.6488 0.6400
2016-17 — AJHL 46 11 13 24 0.522 0.1731 0.1623 0.4835 0.4534
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Marian D1 — SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Marian D1 — JR 17 4 4 8 0.471
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA JR 17 4 4 8 0.471
2018-19 Marian D1 — SO 16 2 2 4 0.250
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA SO 16 2 2 4 0.250
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#31921
Forward overall
#1345
Forward born in 1996
#1263
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Hopfner
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Doden
Augsburg · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.