IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Taulien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Advantage NCDC 37 3 2 5 0.135 0.0551 0.0551 0.1086 0.1086
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 57 9 20 29 0.509 0.1869 0.1945 0.5370 0.5587
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 22 1 1 2 0.091 0.0536 0.0508 0.2730 0.2587
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 37 1 5 6 0.162
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 36 3 9 12 0.333
2023-24 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 27 2 6 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · Ferris State
+189.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15894
Defenseman overall
#2924
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Dach
Assumption · 2022-23
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Shane
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Sheehan
Hamline · 2017-18
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.