IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Taulien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Advantage NCDC 37 3 2 5 0.135 0.0753 0.0753 0.1092 0.1092
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 57 9 20 29 0.509 0.2016 0.2098 0.5342 0.5558
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 22 1 1 2 0.091 0.0559 0.0530 0.2678 0.2538
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 37 1 5 6 0.162
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 36 3 9 12 0.333
2023-24 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 27 2 6 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · Ferris State
+171.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16031
Defenseman overall
#2944
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will O'Neill
Worcester State · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stewart Sjoberg
Neumann · 2003-04
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Swanson
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.