← New Search ↗ Social Card

Konnar Dechaine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0366 0.0384 0.1077 0.1129
2016-17 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 54 33 35 68 1.259 0.2103 0.1971 0.5242 0.4914
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen JR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SO 5 0 1 1 0.200
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 5 0 1 1 0.200
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 13 2 3 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Stout
+236.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16159
Forward overall
#630
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2024-25
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.