← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Bewick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-05 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.1311 0.1438 0.6668 0.7311
2023-24 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 2 14 16 0.258 0.1523 0.1594 0.7745 0.8108
2024-25 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 1 9 10 0.161 0.0952 0.0948 0.4840 0.4820
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 65 1 20 21 0.323 0.1869 0.1765 0.8460 0.7991
2026-27 Ottawa 67's OHL 6 0 4 4 0.667 0.3857 0.3857 1.7457 1.7457
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10674
Defenseman overall
#2099
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OHL 2024-25
0.08
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2014-15
0.69
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2021-22
0.30
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.