IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Falanga Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — AJHL 46 6 10 16 0.348 0.1162 0.1135 0.3229 0.3153
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 15 15 30 0.682 0.2047 0.1969 0.5616 0.5401
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 15 3 4 7 0.467
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 19 6 5 11 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2017-18 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+313.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24639
Forward overall
#1038
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Moore
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Mismash
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Gauthier
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.