IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ean Mendeszoon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0310 0.0317 0.1105 0.1128
2015-16 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 17 0 5 5 0.294 0.0431 0.0432 0.2306 0.2244
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 38 2 8 10 0.263 0.0385 0.0369 0.1289 0.1234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Nazareth D1 UCHC SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2020-21 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2019-20 Nazareth D1 UCHC JR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2018-19 Nazareth D1 UCHC SO 18 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 18 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#19904
Defenseman overall
#2371
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reilly McKinnon
Canton · 2021-22
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Pupp
Marian · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin LaDouce
Finlandia · 2008-09
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.