IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Pupp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 55 1 5 6 0.109 0.0366 0.0374 0.1011 0.1034
2017-18 Winkler Flyers MJHL 38 6 12 18 0.474 0.0912 0.0895 0.2985 0.2929
2018-19 — MJHL 55 5 17 22 0.400 0.0770 0.0713 0.2521 0.2335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 2 2 4 0.148
2021-22 Marian D3 NCHA JR 14 1 4 5 0.357
2020-21 Marian D1 — SO 15 2 5 7 0.467
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA SO 15 2 5 7 0.467
2019-20 Marian D1 — FR 13 0 4 4 0.308
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA FR 13 0 4 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2019-20 · Marian
+314.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17194
Defenseman overall
#2546
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Volmert
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Warkentin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2005-06
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Cosmos
Concordia · 2003-04
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.