IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Bernard-Docker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-06-30 Country: Canada
2018 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #26  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — AJHL 54 7 15 22 0.407 0.1352 0.1528 0.3776 0.4267
2017-18 — AJHL 49 20 21 41 0.837 0.2776 0.2981 0.7755 0.8326
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 27 3 15 18 0.667
2019-20 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 32 7 18 25 0.781
2018-19 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 36 5 12 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2018-19 · North Dakota
+108.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Neal Pionk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Brodzinski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Gross
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Corey Schueneman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.