IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colby Wolter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 33 3 10 13 0.394 0.1321 0.1391 0.3644 0.3838
2018-19 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 59 8 20 28 0.475 0.1592 0.1600 0.4391 0.4412
2019-20 Portage Terriers MJHL 14 3 3 6 0.429 0.0825 0.0825 0.2708 0.2708
2020-21 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 21 5 9 14 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2021-22 · Anna Maria
+413.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40645
Forward overall
#2213
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Greg Whittle
Elmira · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Farley
Utica · 2005-06
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Lozinski
Albertus Magnus · 2022-23
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.