IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roc Truman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 51 24 17 41 0.804 0.2696 0.2874 0.7415 0.7905
2019-20 — AJHL 29 7 23 30 1.034 0.3470 0.3470 0.9542 0.9542
2020-21 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 13 0 5 5 0.385 0.1290 0.1290 0.3548 0.3548
2021-22 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 49 15 26 41 0.837 0.2806 0.2582 0.7718 0.7103
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 32 8 11 19 0.594
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 2 1 0 1 0.500
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21986
Forward overall
#1076
Forward born in 2001
#549
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.