← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Bodnarchuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 47 2 10 12 0.255 0.0856 0.0917 0.2366 0.2534
2019-20 AJHL 50 6 16 22 0.440 0.1476 0.1476 0.4078 0.4078
2020-21 Calgary Canucks AJHL 12 0 7 7 0.583 0.1956 0.1956 0.5406 0.5406
2021-22 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 42 9 25 34 0.809 0.2715 0.2512 0.7502 0.6942
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SR 33 0 1 1 0.030
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 13 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 30 2 2 4 0.133
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5723
Defenseman overall
#1290
Defenseman born in 2001
#739
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.