← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sheldon Kwiatkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0739 0.1851 0.2040
2019-20 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 19 0 2 2 0.105 0.0353 0.0353 0.0974 0.0974
2020-21 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 24 7 9 16 0.667 0.2236 0.2138 0.6170 0.5898
2022-23 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 49 7 25 32 0.653 0.2190 0.1985 0.6044 0.5479
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA 10 2 4 6 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2023-24 · Marian
+242.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32218
Forward overall
#1919
Forward born in 2002
#1040
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.