← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Dean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 9 3 5 8 0.889 0.2981 0.2981 0.8238 0.8238
2021-22 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 60 19 30 49 0.817 0.2739 0.2664 0.7569 0.7362
2022-23 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 60 18 27 45 0.750 0.2515 0.2322 0.6951 0.6417
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 27 3 12 15 0.556
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 21 3 15 18 0.857
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-40.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20171
Forward overall
#1097
Forward born in 2002
#481
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.