← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Cox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 24 1 10 11 0.458 0.0765 0.0765 0.1908 0.1908
2020-21 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 12 2 12 14 1.167 0.1948 0.1948 0.4857 0.4857
2021-22 NOJHL 33 7 27 34 1.030 0.1721 0.1588 0.4289 0.3957
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 14 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Canton
+33.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6262
Defenseman overall
#1382
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2008-09
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.