IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Dovey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Burlington Cougars OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Burlington Cougars OJHL 14 3 4 7 0.500 0.1397 0.1417 0.3451 0.3500
2008-09 Oakville Blades OJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1397 0.1282 0.3451 0.3167
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 11 10 21 0.750
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 23 7 5 12 0.522
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 27 8 6 14 0.518
2009-10 Adrian D3 — FR 24 5 14 19 0.792
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2009-10 · Adrian
+592.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29557
Forward overall
#1183
Forward born in 1988
#2632
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stephen Beck
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Erlacher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Mark
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.