IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Dovey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Burlington Cougars OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Burlington Cougars OJHL 14 3 4 7 0.500 0.1226 0.1243 0.3443 0.3492
2008-09 Oakville Blades OJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1125 0.3443 0.3159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 11 10 21 0.750
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 23 7 5 12 0.522
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 27 8 6 14 0.518
2009-10 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 24 5 14 19 0.792
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2009-10 · Adrian
+689.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36814
Forward overall
#1241
Forward born in 1988
#2215
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stephen Beck
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Erlacher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tony DuFour
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
0.606 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.