IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Jastrzebski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-27 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 7 0 4 4 0.571 0.2264 0.2503 — —
2023-24 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 59 17 39 56 0.949 0.3761 0.3979 0.9820 0.9941
2024-25 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 11 18 29 0.468 0.2875 0.2764 1.3779 1.3246
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA FR 37 9 13 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2025-26 · Augustana
+113.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13577
Forward overall
#669
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Mania
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Joy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.