← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cy Toth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 50 3 4 7 0.140 0.0270 0.0270 0.0882 0.0882
2020-21 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.0963 0.0963 0.3151 0.3151
2021-22 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 38 5 6 11 0.289 0.0557 0.0518 0.1824 0.1697
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 34 1 5 6 0.176
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 34 1 5 6 0.176
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 34 1 5 6 0.176
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 34 1 5 6 0.176
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 34 1 5 6 0.176
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 34 1 5 6 0.176

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23651
Defenseman overall
#3360
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.