IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Rego Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-10-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 27 12 9 21 0.778 0.1541 0.1541 0.3544 0.3544
2019-20 Brooks Bandits AJHL 54 24 37 61 1.130 0.3789 0.3789 1.0453 1.0453
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 18 5 11 16 0.889 0.2981 0.2981 0.8226 0.8226
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 36 8 16 24 0.667
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 35 2 8 10 0.286
2022-23 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 33 2 7 9 0.273
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 32 2 9 11 0.344
2020-21 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3173
Defenseman overall
#687
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Walinski
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rocco Andreacchi
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Reynolds
Saint Anselm · 2022-23
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.